Legal Opinion

Belth v. Garamendi

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1991No. A051541PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

—In this case we hold that Government Code section 6259, subdivision (d), mandates an award of court costs and reasonable attorney fees to a plaintiff who prevails in litigation filed under the California Public Records Act. We further hold that the plaintiff has prevailed within the meaning of the statute when he or she files an action which results in defendant releasing a copy of a previously withheld document.

Joseph M. Belth appeals from an order denying his request for statutory attorney fees in connection with Public Records Act litigation against then-insurance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. San Gabriel Tribune v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Filarsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Rogers v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Bernardi v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Hogar v. Community Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API