Legal Opinion

State v. Bostic

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1995No. COA94-1359PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions to dismiss the charge of second degree murder because the evidence presented was insufficient as a matter of law. When a party moves to dismiss based on insufficiency of the evidence, the trial court must determine whether there is substantial evidence of each element of the crime charged. State v. Bates, 309 N.C. 528, 533-34, 308 S.E.2d 258, 262 (1983). “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” State v. O’Rourke, 114…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. ChildressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. HannahCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API