Legal Opinion

Alex J. Mandl, Inc. v. San Roman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 4, 1948No. 9572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s suit to recover damages from defendants, incurred, as it claims, because of defendants’ breach of implied warranty to deliver merchantable goods, after trial by the court without a jury, resulted in a judgment in its favor for $9708.18 and costs. Upon appeal defendants assign various errors but, in view of our conclusion, we think it unnecessary to notice any other than the one alleging an erroneous finding by the District Court that defendants did not stipulate as a part of the contract of sale that they would not be bound by any implied warranty as to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Buckley v. Shell Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Bridgeport L. A. W. Corporation v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Maryland Motor Car Ins. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Burntisland Shipbuilding Co. v. Barde Steel Products Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Charles v. Judge & Dolph, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API