Legal Opinion

Bond Bros. v. Kay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1931No. 8 Div. 315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The complaint as originally filed was in two counts, each claiming the amount sued for, due by account for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to W. B. Good-son by plaintiffs at the special instance and' request of defendant. The pleas thereto were the general issue and the statute of frauds, viz., that the promise was not in writing to answer for debt, default, or miscarriage of another.

At the trial the complaint was amended by adding six additional counts. Some of these counts were eliminated by demurrer and some charged out by the court; and counts 4, 5, and 8 were left.

Demurre…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butler v. WaltonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Montgomery v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. American Ins. Co. v. MillicanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Home Investment & Loan Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API