Thompson v. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
Action for damages for wrongful refusal to furnish electricity to light plaintiff’s apartment.
Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the defendant is a corporation organized and existing in the state of California for the purpose of supplying for public use gas and electric light; that the plaintiff was at all times mentioned in the complaint the occupant of a certain described apartment in the city and county of San Francisco, which apartment was fitted for using electricity, and was situated within the territory served by said company with gas and electric illumination. That in the month…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Robbins v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Shepard v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Johnson v. Goodyear Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dollar-A-Day Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegragh Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Product Research Associates v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hansen v. Vallejo Electric Light Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Thompson v. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912