Phipps v. State

Carley, Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of running a stop sign and failing to have proof of insurance. He appeals pro se from the judgments of conviction and the sentence of confinement entered by the trial court on the jury’s guilty verdicts.

In his sole enumeration of error, appellant urges that he was denied due process by being forced to trial without effective assistance of counsel.

Decided May 15, 1991 Rehearing denied June 11, 1991. Tony L. Phipps, pro se.

The record reveals that counsel was appointed to represent appellant on three separate occasions. However,…