Legal Opinion

Mercier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1992No. A91A2213PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellants Mercier and Nuzum were tried before a jury and found guilty of criminal violations committed in connection with their protest against abortion. They appeal jointly from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered by the trial court on the jury’s guilty verdicts.

1. Nuzum has filed no separate enumeration of error or brief. However, this court never entered an order, pursuant to Rule 14 (a), directing him to do so. Nothing in Rule 14 (a) of this court authorizes the dismissal of a case wherein this court has itself failed to enter an order directing that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Zachary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Bess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. DeBroux v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Staples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Gamble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Brison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Coppolla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API