Van Cortlandt v. de Graffenried
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Baron Raoul de Graffenried, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 5th day of September, 1911, overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the second cause of action alleged in the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, P. J.:
The defendant demurred to the second cause of action set up in what is called the amended and supplemental complaint, which seems to be the only complaint in the action and on which plaintiff seeks to recover. The ground of demurrer is stated to be that the second alleged cause of action contained in the amended and supplemental complaint herein does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It is in this second cause of action that the plaintiff, who was a resident and citizen'of the State of New York, was married at the city of Paris in the republic of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of MajotNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Bonati v. . WelschNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amey v. Colebrook Guaranty Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Kindler v. KindlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lemyé v. SirkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Strebler v. WolfNew York Supreme Court · 1934