Legal Opinion

Woodall v. Neil

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 3, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 5897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FRANK W. WILSON, Chief Judge.

This is a proceeding upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The respondent has now filed an answer to the petition in which he denies each alleged constitutional error. The case is before the Court upon the respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The motion is based upon the pleadings, the affidavit of C. B. Coleman, and the brief of the respondent. The petitioner, through his attorney, has filed a responsive brief. The motion for summary judgment is directed to each and every allegation of the petition.

The petitioner contends in the first ground…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Venson Woodall v. W. S. Neil, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API