Legal Opinion

Orsen Et Ux. v. Siegle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This suit was filed by A. L. Orsen and Fannie Orsen, husband and wife, on March 21, 1936, against Carl Siegle and Elsie Siegle, husband and wife, and others, to have declared fraudulent and void as to creditors a conveyance of lands in Malheur county, Oregon, by Siegle and his wife to the defendant C. J. Brown. The trial was had September 10,1941. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case the court, on motion of the defendants, entered a decree of dismissal with prejudice from which this appeal is taken.

The deed of conveyance attacked is dated November 6, 1934. The Orsen judgment, in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Denigan v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Clarke v. Philomath CollegeOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rowe v. Shenandoah Pulp Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Robson v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Stoer v. Ocklawaha River Farms Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hassett v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Evans v. TrudeOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Newman v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Branchfield, Trustee v. McCULLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Postelle v. ShuholmOregon Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API