Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. (“Parsons”) alleges that the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) breached a contract with it1 when the FRA refused Parsons’ requests for indemnification. There is a provision in the contract, whereby the FRA is required to indemnify Parsons for certain losses exceeding a $1 million deductible. Parsons asserts that covered losses from its payments to other parties have now exceeded $2.4 million.
The case is now before the Court on a set of three motions filed by the Government. First, in Defendant’s Motion to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- System Planning Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010