Legal Opinion

Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 3, 2008No. 08-079CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. (“Parsons”) alleges that the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) breached a contract with it1 when the FRA refused Parsons’ requests for indemnification. There is a provision in the contract, whereby the FRA is required to indemnify Parsons for certain losses exceeding a $1 million deductible. Parsons asserts that covered losses from its payments to other parties have now exceeded $2.4 million.

The case is now before the Court on a set of three motions filed by the Government. First, in Defendant’s Motion to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. System Planning Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API