United States v. William Muldrow
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge HENDRICKS joined.
DUNCAN, .Circuit Judge:
• Defendants William Henry Muldrow (“Muldrow”). and Luis Gomez (“Gomez”) challenge the district court’s determination that the Guidelines commentary—as amended by. United States Sentencing Guideline Amendment 759 (“Amendment 759”)—requires a district court at resen-tencing to calculate the “applicable guide line range” without applying , any departures or variances from a defendant’s original sentencing range. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Thomas McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Daniel WirsingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- United States v. Jason LeatchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Alfonza McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.