Legal Opinion

United States v. William Muldrow

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2016No. 15-7298, 15-7608PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge HENDRICKS joined.

DUNCAN, .Circuit Judge:

• Defendants William Henry Muldrow (“Muldrow”). and Luis Gomez (“Gomez”) challenge the district court’s determination that the Guidelines commentary—as amended by. United States Sentencing Guideline Amendment 759 (“Amendment 759”)—requires a district court at resen-tencing to calculate the “applicable guide line range” without applying , any departures or variances from a defendant’s original sentencing range. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Daniel WirsingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  4. United States v. Jason LeatchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Alfonza McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API