Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Houseman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. The opinion, filed at the session of the court in April, 1889, states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Chtriam:
This case was decided in this court on January 5,1889, (21 Pac. Rep. 284,) and in due time a motion for a rehearing was filed, which motion has now been presented to this court. Nearly every point presented by counsel in their original briefs has been again presented by counsel in their oral argument upon the motion for the rehearing. It is unnecessary, however, to again discuss any point which has already been .discussed in the former opinion, for we think that such opinion correctly states the law and the facts of the *305case as far as it goes. Nor do we think that it is necessary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Colrick v. . SwinburneNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Gatton v. TolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Silsby Manufacturing Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harlan v. LoomisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Kuykendall v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914