Legal Opinion

Bledsoe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A jury found defendant (appellant) guilty of the possession or utterance of a forged check, "with intent to defraud" and "having knowledge that said instrument was forged in violation of Section 13A-9-6 of the Code of Alabama."

A major contention of appellant is that the trial court erred in overruling defendant's objections to the testimony of witnesses that during the same month of the commission of the alleged crime in the instant case, the defendant was in possession of and uttered three forged checks which purported to be checks of the same drawer and drawn on the same bank as the check…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PettySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Stubbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Burke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API