Currie v. Southern Manufacturers Club, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConNOR, J.
When the property of the defendant in this action came into the possession of the receiver appointed by the court, neither the city of Charlotte nor Mecklenburg County had a lien on said property for the taxes which had been theretofore levied against the defendant, and which were then unpaid. No levy had been made on said property for said taxes by the tax collector of the city of Charlotte or by the sheriff of Mecklenburg County. It is provided by statute that “taxes shall not be a lien upon personal property but from the levy thereon.” C. S., 7986. Coltrane v. Donnell, 203 N. C., 515, 166…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carstarphen v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Alexander v. . FarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Town of Shelby v. TiddySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Raleigh County Bank v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- Coltrane v. . DonnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932