Legal Opinion
Overholt v. Emrick
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 2019No. 17CA0083-MPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Overholt v. Emrick,
2019-Ohio-1273.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) MARK OVERHOLT, et al. C.A. No. 17CA0083-M Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JUDITH EMRICK, ZONING INSPECTOR, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al. COUNTY OF MEDINA, OHIO CASE No. 14CIV0357 Appellees DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: April 8, 2019 CALLAHAN, Judge. {¶1} Appellants, Mark Overholt and his wife, Sheryl Overholt, appeal a decision of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas that rejected their administrative appeal. This Court affirms in part…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Independence v. Office of the Cuyahoga Cty. Executive (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Gerzeny v. Richfield TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. Richfield Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- 729 W. 130th St., L.L.C. v. Hinckley Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024