J. LEWIS MADORSKY CO., LPA v. Nolan
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
On December 31, 1997, Plaintiff J. Lewis Madorsky filed a motion for default judgment or summary judgment [Doc. 25]. Defendants R.J. Nolan and Tannol Holdings have filed no opposition. 1 In his motion, Plaintiff Madorsky seeks judgment against Defendants for the reasons that (1) Defendants have yet to answer Plaintiffs complaint filed with the Court on November 11, 1996, 2 and (2) Defendants have failed or neglected to pay Plaintiff Madorsky for services rendered. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Niemi v. NHK Spring Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007