Legal Opinion
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Bledsoe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1925No. 6789PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
The railway company, plaintiff here and below, sued the defendant, the county treasurer of Comanche county, Okl., to recover certain taxes alleged to have been illegally levied against its railroad properties in that county, and paid under protest. The action is a statutory one under the provisions of section 9971, Oklahoma Comp. Stats. 1921, providing a form of action in such cases.
The petition alleges the illegality of 31 different tax levies, but the only question urged by the railway company in this court is the alleged error of the court in the judgment entered upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Attorney General ex rel. Dingeman v. LacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Continental Resources, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- Hamdi Abdel Munim Abu Khalaf, et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corporation, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980