Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Amos

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 4, 1968No. 36936PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice.

This proceeding comes before this Court on a Petition for Review filed by H. D. Amos, herein referred to as Petitioner. The relief sought is the recall of the mandate and vacation of this Court’s decision in the case of Marshall v. Amos, Okl., 300 P.2d 990. In that case the trial court had rendered judgment in favor of Petitioner and on appeal this Court reversed the judgment of the trial court.

In so far as pertinent to these proceedings, Petitioner alleged that N. S. Corn, then a member of this Court and one of the five Justices who concurred in said decision (300…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Runyan v. City of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Vines v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Dearing v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API