Legal Opinion
Nealon v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1995No. 93-CV-983, 93-CV-1058PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellants, Elizabeth Nealon and the Har-ford Mutual Insurance Company (Harford), appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing their complaints for damages against appellee, the District of Columbia (the District), allegedly caused by the District’s decision to lower the water pressure in fire hydrants in the Shepherd Park area of the city, rendering it inadequate to combat the fires which caused their losses. The District filed a motion to dismiss appellants’ separate complaints for failure to state a claim under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 12(b)(6). 1 The District argued…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wade v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kenley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Casco Marina Development, L.L.C. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hunter Ex Rel. A.H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Tucci v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Howell v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.