Legal Opinion

McPherson v. Wiswell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Davidson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In July 1877, A. N.'Wisweil entered into an oral agreement with James and E. C. Marsh, whereby he was to receive from said Marshes a large number of harvesting machines, known as Marsh No.4 and Valley Chief. Twenty-seven of these machines were then at Beatrice in the care *626of one Harrison, an agent of the Marshes, and a certain number in addition were to'be furnished in the year 1878. In. payment for these machines Wiswell was to assign to the Marshes his interest in three sections of school land in Gage county, and convey by deed a quarter section of land in Kansas. He also sold them certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Ward v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Lamb v. LathropNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Curtiss v. GreenbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  5. Smith v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McCarthy v. Bowling Green Storage & Van Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. McPherson v. WiswellNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Carmack v. McKinneyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API