Legal Opinion

McPherson v. Wiswell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Pound, J., sitting for Broady, J. cited: Baton v. JRediek, 1 Neb., 805. Gillet v. Maynard, 5 Johns., 85. Frost v. Clarkson, 7 Cow., 24. Minert v. FmericJc, 6 Wis., 355. cited: 2 Kent Com., 508. Lamb v. Lathrop, 13 Wend., 97. Smith v. Loomis, 7 Conn., 115. Hadley v. Pugh, 1 Wright, 554. Sands v. Taylor, 5 Johns., 395. Frey v. Drahos, 10 Neb., 594.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

This cause was before this court at the July term, 1884, when the judgment of the district court was reversed and the cause remanded. 16 Neb., 625. It seems that upon the second trial there was again á verdict and judgment for the defendants; and the cause is again brought to this court on error by the plaintiff.

The cause was tried in the court below the second, time on the same pleadings as the first, except that before the *118second trial the plaintiff, by leave of the court, filed an amended reply; but, as the pleadings were not very fully set out in the former opinion, I will copy the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. HartfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Goldsmith v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. McPherson v. WiswellNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Seaver v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Beck v. StaatsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API