Legal Opinion

Valentine Properties Associates, LP v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 2011No. 05 Civ. 2033PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Valentine Properties, LP (‘Valentine”) and Park Properties, LP (“Park”), collectively, the “Plaintiffs”, filed a motion for summary judgment on April 29, 2010. Defendants United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and Alphonso Jackson (“Jackson”), collectively, the “Defendants,” cross-filed for judgment on the pleadings on the same day. Oral argument was heard on October 13, 2010. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied and Defendants’ motion is granted.

I. Statement of Facts and Prior Proceedings

Plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walters v. Performant Recovery, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  2. American Trucking Associations v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Greene v. CarsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2020 Ncbc 60aNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
  5. Fezzani v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API