Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Village of Wilmette

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 24, 2001No. 1 — 99—3144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE QUINN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Judd Siegel, brought suit against defendant, the Village of Wilmette, for injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell on ice accumulated on a sidewalk owned by defendant, the Village of Wilmette. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court granted. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment because a reasonable jury could have concluded that the ice was an unnatural accumulation due to the defective nature of the sidewalk. We affirm.

O…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. McCann v. Bethesda HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Arvidson v. City of ElmhurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Smith v. Armor Plus Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Hartung v. Maple Investment & Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rios v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Stokes v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Burns v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. Burns v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. Fox v. Adams & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API