Legal Opinion

Stokes v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 31, 2002No. 1-01-2607PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

William Stokes sued the City of Chicago (the City) for injuries he said he sustained when his foot caught in a hole in the sidewalk at 656 North Green Street. Throughout the trial the City insisted it had the right to impeach Stokes’s credibility with his three prior burglary convictions. The trial court was equally insistent that the City had no such right.

The jury found in favor of Stokes, awarding him $30,000 in damages. The single issue in this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it refused to allow the City to impeach Stokes.

We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Because…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. SpatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. WhirlAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. People v. FlynnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Kozik v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025
  5. People v. FlynnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API