Spielman v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
EUBANK, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award denying a petition to reopen. The sole issue preserved for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support this denial. Because the evidence is sufficient, we affirm the award.
Petitioner employee (claimant), while working as a drywaller in June 1979, suffered a compensable left shoulder injury.1 He underwent surgery in July 1979 for an impingement of the anterior lateral aspect of the acromion and the coracoacromial ligament. A small rotator cuff tear was also discovered and repaired. After this surgery,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Western Bonded Products v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Estes Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Teller v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Aguirre v. goodyear/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Aguirre v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Calder v. interstate/zurichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Gilbert Aguirre Jr v. ica/city of GoodyearArizona Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.