Dalzin v. Belshe
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action seeking a declaration that California’s “proportionate share” system for the recovery of Medi-Cal funds violates federal law. Plaintiffs also seek an injunction enjoining the defendants from enforcing this system against them. Currently pending before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction against the enforcement of the law. For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motions will be granted, and defendants’ motion will be denied.
I
The facts of this ease are undisputed.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heidi Sargent Jeldness, Jenny Costa, Helen Jodi Bedell, Gretchen M. Schumacher, and v. Fred B. Pearce, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Transcon Lines, Debtor. Leonard L. Gumport, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Transcon Lines v. Sterling PressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murchison v. Murchison CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021