Legal Opinion

Lavallee v. Justices in the Hampden Superior Court

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 28, 2004PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The petitioners are indigent criminal defendants who have no attorneys to represent them due to a shortage of lawyers in the Hampden County bar advocates program.4 That shortage has been caused by the low rate of attorney compensation authorized by the annual budget appropriation. For fiscal year (FY) 2004 the authorized rates for private counsel were thirty dollars an hour for a District Court case, thirty-nine dollars an *230hour for a Superior Court case other than a homicide case, and fifty-four dollars an hour for a homicide case. See St. 2003, c. 26, § 2, line item 0321-1510.5 Since 1986…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. State v. CitizenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MeansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. CharlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API