Legal Opinion
I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 1963PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The principal law question on these cross appeals is whether the Supreme Court committed reversible error in-awarding exemplary damages as incidental to injunctive relief.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleged.a “plain and concise statement of the material facts ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241) and “ a demand of the judgment to which [it] supposed [itself] entitled ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 255). The facts alleged were that plaintiff was the lessee in possession of the street level floor in the building of one of the defendants; that all of the defendants caused the premises to be broken into at night on two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Lynch v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Jamaica Savings Bank v. M. S. Investing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- City of Syracuse v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Dotlich v. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Charles v. Epperson & CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.