Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Scranton
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1976No. Appeal, No. 153 Misc. DktPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Rule 2101 of the Rules of Judicial Administration of our Supreme Court provides that the Commonwealth Court shall review awards of arbitrators appointed in conformity with an Act of Assembly to arbitrate disputes between public employers and their employees.1 Our scope of review in this case is limited to a determination of the legality of the present award. Washington Arbitration Case, 436 Pa. 168, 259 A.2d 437 (1969).
The controversy before us arises under the terms of the Act of June 24, 1968, P.L. 237, as amended, 43 P.S. §217.1 et seq. (commonly referred to as Act…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Cheltenham Township v. Cheltenham Township Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- TATE v. ANTOSHCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- City of Reading v. Reading Lodge Fraternal Order of Police No. 9Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In re the Arbitration between City of Erie & Haas Memorial Lodge, No. 7Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Fiorelli v. City of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- City of Philadelphia v. City Firefighters' Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.