Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 2019No. 5:19-cv-00248Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA VIRGIL PAUL DICKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-19-248-SM ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Virgil Paul Dickson (Plaintiff) brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision that he was not “disabled” under the Social Security Act. See

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 423(d)(1)(A). The parties have consented to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API