Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1957No. Docket 41, Calendar 47,003Published

1DissentCarr, J.

The parties to this pro-ceeding are in agreement as to the material facts involved. Plaintiff entered the employ of defendant on May 11, 1954. Her work was clerical in nature, involving the performance of general office duties. On May 26th following, she left her place of employment, on the second floor of defendant’s building, -about 11:30 a.m., her lunch period being ordinarily from 11:30 to 12:30. She went to the third floor where she had her lunch, remaining there for a brief interval after finishing the meal. She then started to leave defendant’s building for the purpose of paying a bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re School District No. 6Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hickman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Crawford v. School District No. 6Michigan Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API