Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Fink

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1997No. 344Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOlszewski, Judge

I most readily join my learned colleagues in their disposal of many of the issues presented in this matter. Nevertheless, as I believe that Officer Whiteman’s seizure of the marijuana pipe was wholly appropriate, I must respectfully dissent. It is settled that officers are justified in seizing non-threatening contraband detected through “Plain feel” during a weapons frisk if “the incriminating nature of the contraband [is] immediately apparent.” Interest of B.C., 453 Pa.Super. 294, 305, 683 A.2d 919, 925 (1996)(emphasis original). Instantly, the trial court concluded that the incriminating…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API