Legal Opinion
Smith v. Lampe
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1933No. 6208PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The suit below was in admiralty by libel in personam; the libelant seeking damages for the stranding of the barge, State of Ohio, on the shore of Lake Erie near Lorain, Ohio, and claiming that negligent signaling by the respondent with the horn of his automobile during a fog caused its loss. From an interlocutory decree in favor of libelant, the respondent appeals.
The appellee, Lampe, the libelant below, was the owner of the wrecked barge and of the tug Peerless, engaged in taking sand from Lake Erie and delivering it at dock in Lorain. On December 18, 1929, during a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Watz v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Charles A. Chapman, Libelant-Appellant v. City of Grosse Pointe Farms, a Michigan Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Taghadomi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- The S. S. SamovarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.