Legal Opinion

Doak v. Milbauer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1984No. 83-433PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Sandra Doak, filed this action on October 14, 1981, praying, inter alia, that defendant-appellee, Michael Milbauer, be declared the father of a child born unto her on August 15, 1972. The trial court sustained Milbauer’s demurrer, dismissed the action, and overruled Doak’s motion for a new trial. This appeal followed. We affirm.

Doak assigns as error the dismissal of her amended petition, because, she argues, the 4-year period of limitations embodied in the pertinent statute is unconstitutional. More specifically, Doak claims that the period of limitations denies children…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mills v. HabluetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. v. WestSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  5. State v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Flynn & Larsen Implement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Flora Ex Rel. Flora v. EscuderoNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ehlers v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Synacek v. Omaha Cold Storage Terminals, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API