Legal Opinion
In Re ANO
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 18, 2004No. 97,980, 99,340, 99,918PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
91 P.3d 646 (2004)
2004 OK 33
In re A.N.O., a minor child.
Nathaniel O'Neal and Christina O'Neal, Appellants,
v.
Floyd Lee Ogle, Jr. and Margaret Ann Ogle, Appellees.
Nos. 97,980, 99,340, 99,918.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 18, 2004.
Hugh V. Rineer, Leonard & Rineer, Tulsa, OK, for Appellants.
James D. Sicking, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tulsa, OK, for the Minor Child.
Luke Goodwin, Tulsa, OK, for Appellees.
EDMONDSON, J.
¶ 1 We are asked by Nathaniel and Christina O'Neal, parents of A.N.O., to determine whether the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction when it granted visitation rights to their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Schwartz v. DiehlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MLC Mortgage Corp. v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- MLC MORTGAGE CORPPORATION v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009