Legal Opinion

King v. Union R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1944No. Appeal, 168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their bill to, restrain Union Railroad Company, organized pursuant to the general railroad law, from exercising the power of eminent domain conferred by that law and the widening Act of March 17, 1869, P. L. 12, as amended, 67 PS section 321. The purpose of the condemnation was to obtain sufficient land for an additional track adjoining its present two track road. Defendant filed preliminary objections setting forth that no cause of action was pleaded. The bill complains that the condemnation is not in the public interest but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Windsor Glass Co. v. Carnegie Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Williams v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Wheeling, P. & B. R. v. WarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Mountz v. Pittsburgh, Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API