Legal Opinion
People v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1990No. H006114PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Asserting that a search by private security guards which yielded LSD and marijuana was illegal, Adam Jason Taylor appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (m)). We affirm.
Facts
On April 10, 1989, at 9:25 p.m., two security guards employed by the Seaside Security Company, the corporate security department of the Seaside Land Company, owner of the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, encountered appellant and three others on a small path under the boardwalk leading from a parking lot to the beach. The four had open containers of beer. One, a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MurilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. Christopher H.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Flournoy v. Walmart Store, Pleasanton CADistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023