Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. Walmart Store, Pleasanton CA

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 27, 2023No. 3:22-cv-06057Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JAMES HENRY FLOURNOY, P00154293, Case No. 22-cv-06057-CRB (PR) 7 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT 8 v. FURTHER LEAVE TO AMEND 9 WALMART STORES, INC., et al., (ECF No. 14) 10 Defendant(s). 11 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Marin County Jail (MCJ) facing state criminal charges in 12 Marin County Superior Court and other county superior courts, and a frequent litigant in federal 13 court, has filed a pro se First Amended Complaint (FAC) for damages under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

14 alleging…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API