Legal Opinion

United States v. Torres

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1981No. Nos. 81-1023 to 81-1025 and 81-1152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendants were convicted of violations of 18 U.S.C. § 471 (manufacture of counterfeit federal reserve notes). Defendant Salsedo was also convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (possession and concealment of counterfeit federal reserve notes). On ap*1013peal, defendants challenge the rulings of the district court on a number of suppression motions.

Defendants challenge the legality of the arrest of defendants Torres, Montes, and Buenrostro and the search and seizure of a paper bag and its contents found on the console of the car which those defendants were in at the time of the arrest. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Robert Dale Hart, United States of America v. Ruben Morales RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. TorresDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Rudolph Marquest Torres, United States of America v. Jose Luis Buenrostro, United States of America v. Richard Stephen Montes, United States of America v. Ernesto Lopes SalsedoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API