Legal Opinion
United States v. Rudolph Marquest Torres, United States of America v. Jose Luis Buenrostro, United States of America v. Richard Stephen Montes, United States of America v. Ernesto Lopes Salsedo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1981No. 81-1023Published
1Opinion of the Court
659 F.2d 1012
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rudolph Marquest TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Luis BUENROSTRO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Stephen MONTES, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ernesto Lopes SALSEDO, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 81-1023 to 81-1025 and 81-1152.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1981.
Decided Oct. 22, 1981.
William J. Owen, Sacramento, Cal., for Salsedo.
Julian C. Macias, Asst. U.S. Atty.,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Robert Dale Hart, United States of America v. Ruben Morales RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. TorresDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1980
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981