Legal Opinion

Lindt v. Henshel

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Fuld.

The plaintiff, claiming to be its owner, brought this action to recover possession of a sculpture which, shortly after her husband’s death, had been delivered to the Guggenheim Museum by his executrices. Judgment has gone against the plaintiff and, on this appeal, here by our leave, the question to be decided is whether a husband’s later payment for an oí jet d’art purchased by his wife is, without more, sufficient to vest title in the husband.

On December 7, 1955, Parke-Bernet Galleries held an auction and among the works advertised for sale was a marble head by Constantin…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Martin v. . HillenNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Weigert v. SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. In re BerardiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. Matter of BerardiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Saff v. SaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Susan W. v. Martin W.New York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Plunkett v. Emergency Medical ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API