Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Edwards

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1922No. 6 Div. 895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Appellee, Edwards, was prosecuted upon a warrant returnable to the recorder’s court in the city of Birmingham. The warrant charged that the defendant “did treat, or offer to treat, the disease of a human being, without first having obtained a certificate of qualification from the State Board of Medical Examiners, contrary to and in violation of section 7564 of the Code of Alabama as amended by an act of the Legislature of Alabama approved September 22, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 661), against the laws and ordinances of the city of Birmingham.” To this charge the defendant filed pleas as to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fealy v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Kreulhaus v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Bracely v. NobleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Jones v. City of DaphneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ex Parte City of AlbanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. State v. KirkpatrickAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Ex Parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API