State v. Kirkpatrick
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamfoe.d, J.
The questions presented by this appeal involve tire validity and construction of the local statutes affecting the public road system of Walker county; If the acts of the Legislature of 1919 hereinafter set out are valid and, compass and embrace the whole subject, then the trial judge was in error in discharging the defendant.
The law insisted upon by the state as being the governing force respecting the subject is contained in two acts of the Legislature of 1919, the latter amendatory of the former, and when read as now amended is as follows:
“An act to create a county highway commission for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Pratt Institute v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Allgood v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Mills v. Court of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Morris v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradford v. CarsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- National Surety Co. v. MorganAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922