Legal Opinion

In re: Petrobras Securities Litigation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 5, 2019No. 18-2708Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18‐2708 In re: Petrobras Securities Litigation UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Gierlinger v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,733 Vera G. White, Consolidated v. Joseph Auerbach, and Manhattan Fund Inc., Mortimer G. Levine, Objectors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Kickham Hanley P.C. v. Kodak Retirement Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API