Legal Opinion
In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 28, 2001No. 21 MC 92(SAS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
These actions represent a consolidation of unique proportions. Since January 2001, plaintiffs have filed more than 1,000 class actions in the Southern District of New York related to the Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”) of over 263 companies (the “Securities Actions”). In the broadest terms, the complaints allege that certain companies issuing stock to the public (“issuers”), their directors and officers, and those investment banks underwriting the IPO process (“underwriters”), violated federal law by manipulating the stocks’ prices.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Public Utilities Commission v. PollakSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Certain Underwriter, in Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Berthelot v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.