Legal Opinion
ARANETA Et Al. v. UNITED STATES
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 19, 1986No. A-18PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice Burger, Circuit Justice.
Applicants, a daughter and son-in-law of former President Ferdinand Marcos, ask that I stay a contempt order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia requiring their incarceration if they fail to testify before a grand jury on July 22. They contend that requiring them to so testify would violate their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination because their testimony might be used against them in related criminal proceedings currently pending in the Philippines. They assert they will file a petition for certiorari…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- ROSTKER, DIRECTOR OF SELECTIVE SERVICE, Et Al. v. GOLDBERG Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In the Matter of the Grand Jury and Susan Marie ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Aloyzas BalsysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Moses v. Allard (In Re Moses)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- United States v. Jurgis Joudis, in Re the Contempt Petition Mecislovas Mikutaitis, Deponent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Araneta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.