In Re Farb
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
A writ of habeas corpus was issued upon the petition of Sam Farb, found guilty under a complaint charging him with violation of chapter 172 of the Statutes of California of 1917. It is conceded by petitioner’s counsel that the one question involved in a final determination of this matter is whether or not that part of the statute is constitutional which prohibits an employer from entering into a contract requiring an employee to surrender to the employer all tips or gratuities received for services rendered to the public on, behalf of the employer. The part of the act pertinent to this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Henning v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Anders v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.