Legal Opinion
Williams v. Smithsonian Institution
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge
Before the court is Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6), and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 10). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant Plaintiffs motion and grant Defendant’s motion, in part. The court considers the facts alleged in the Amended Complaint in ruling on Defendant’s motion.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff Samuel C. Williams is African-American. He was formerly employed by Defendant, the Smithsonian Institution, as a Management and Program Analyst in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simmons v. MeinkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Williams v. Smithsonian InstitutionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019