Legal Opinion

Nevels v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1936No. 8266PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

The parties will be designated as appellants and appellee.

Appellee, H. H. Harris, sued appellants, J. H. Newsom and wife, Audrey Newsom, W. B. Slaton, F. E. Redwine, and W. D. Nevels, on their promissory note for $6,400, payable to Otto Stollcy, who assigned it to appellee, and to foreclose a deed of trust lien securing the note executed by New-som and wife, on a section of land situated in Lynn and Dawson counties; and a trial to the court without a jury resulted in judgment for appellee as prayed; hence this appeal.

The defense to the note was usury, appellants alleging that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Mallory v. Columbia Mortgage & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Stuart v. Tenison Bros. Saddlery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Webb v. Southern Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Sales v. Mercantile Nat. Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Stuart v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Matthews v. TibbittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. National Life Ins. Co. v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API